I've done some more work on this painting. It didn't feel like it had been that long since I'd worked on it, but it is a bad sign when you need to dust your pallete off before use.
Here's the current status:
I have always loved cropped details of my paintings. The way that the colors and textures interact always feels surprising to me - like something I didn't intend, but just happened upon when I wasn't paying attention. Here's a detail from my recent efforts:
I tend to feel like details like this make really nice abstract compositions, and yet I very rarely paint abstractly, and when I do, the results lack interest for me. Abstract painting in general lacks interest for me. As with poetry, where I love a good turn of phrase or pairing of words, but cannot get into work that is all about the aesthetics of words without any larger story or image involved, I love the abstract details of interacting paint, but need it to be couched in a discernible narrative, image, or idea.
For a as long as I've been painting, that larger image has almost always involved the human figure, but in this painting so far, and in my last one, I actually ended up paying much more attention to the background. As if the figure was an excuse for painting bushes and wallpaper. It makes me wonder if I should try doing some work that is not abstract, but not figurative. Work where I abandon the figure altogether, and focus on what I've been putting behind them.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Or maybe you should just embrace the interaction between figures and setting? Maybe the person is the background to the world they are in? Or is that too BS sounding? I feel like taking the figures out of the paintings would make it harder for a majority of viewers to connect with them as easily.
ReplyDeleteBecause you think I don't read your blog anymore...
ReplyDeleteI...cannot get into work that is all about the aesthetics of words without any larger story or image involved, I love the abstract details of interacting paint, but need it to be couched in a discernible narrative...
I'm the same way. With art, with film (the characters and narrative are much more important to me than cinematography), with music (lyrics over sound; in fact, with instrumental music, I can't differentiate one song from another). Patrick and I talked about this a lot. He once took me to a silent film, and by the end of it, I had no idea what was going on. Without language, I couldn't follow the narrative. It's different with static art, I guess, because I can stand there for as long as I want to invent a narrative for a painting. When I can't, I move on, uninterested.